|
The Whole Language
School of Golf
Courtesy of
by Dr. Kerry
Hempenstall
Dr. Kerry Hempenstall is an educational psychologist,
lecturing in psychology at the Department of Psychology and
Intellectual Disability Studies at the Royal Melbourne
Institute of Technology in Victoria, Australia. Before
becoming a psychologist, he taught school for many years and
worked as a social worker with disabled children. He
believes strongly that educational decision-making too often
neglects empirical research findings in favor of fashionable
but unsubstantiated approaches. His controversial articles
in The Melbourne Age have made clear his concern for
educational reform to ensure a better outcome for students
at risk. His articles may be viewed at
http://www.rmit.edu.au/browse;ID=lkoixu1se7qo;STATUS=A?QRY=Hempenstall&STYPE=PEOPLE
Well folks, here we are at the Whole Language School
of Golf with our two founders - Smith and Goodman. What can
you tell us about your method of teaching beginning golfers?
"Yes, well, our approach to teaching golf is more of a
philosophy than a method. We consider that golf is an
holistic experience which comprises more than the sum of its
parts. Golf, to us, is an irreducible experience best
learned by doing, so we enter all our novices in the
Australian Open because that's authentic golf. Our role is
that of motivator/facilitator, we empower our students to
grow in golf. We do not teach skills, of course; even though
some students request help with their swing, we explain that
swing is only a sub-skill of golf, and to emphasize it out
of the context of authentic golf is time-wasting or even
harmful."
"We do like to see our learners practise their invented
swing during the Open itself, of course; the principles of
the swing are eventually induced by the learner who is
highly motivated during an Open, but probably bored to tears
and disheartened by artificially timetabled swing practice.
Thus we (along with another former champion, "Jocular"
Johnny Rousseau) consider that the swing will evolve
naturally, that feedback is pointless and it may even damage
the essential confidence that learners need if they are to
take risks with their golf. Since golf is as natural as
learning to speak, we allow it to develop, rather than
forcing it - just as speech developed."
"Golf being such a natural pursuit, there is no need to
demonstrate grip, stance, or even which end of the club is
best to hold - gradually, through playing in authentic
tournaments, the efforts of the novice will more and more
closely approximate that of Greg Norman. If for any reason
development is slow, probably caused by earlier misguided
attempts at skill instruction, we provide entry into other
golfing majors, such as Augusta, or St. Andrews - more
immersion in real golf is the answer. Golf improvement
depends largely on the learner's establishment of a
self-regulating and self-improving system, not on anything
an instructor provides."
"We also ensure that our students don't practise their
chipping or bunker shots, as that involves fractionating the
great game. Similarly, we consider driving ranges and
putting greens are merely mind-numbing traps only used by
old-fashioned, ignorant instructors who fail to understand
the implications of the new research literature on preferred
golfing styles."
"Golfing-for-meaning is our mantra, because of course
golf is a very personal activity. Only by considering the
golf experience from a developmentalist-constructivist-relativist
perspective can we move away from the notion of goals
prescribed autocratically from above. We believe that
players can progress far beyond the shallow objectives of
the ball-in-hole-in-minimum-strokes model which dominates in
certain quarters. Our players are encouraged to achieve
satisfaction of their own diverse needs, which may be
markedly different from those of course-designers, or
self-appointed traditionalists. The golfers transact with
the course, bringing their own unique understandings and
experiences to the event; they should not feel tied down by
conventional notions of what the process should mean to the
player."
"We also teach a revolutionary strategy in that we
encourage our learners to disengage from the tyranny of the
ball. The ball is only marginally relevant to the game, and
is too often over-emphasised. It is, after all, only one cue
to the deeper transacted meaning of the golfing experience.
Students are sometimes bemused when we instruct them to pay
as little attention as possible to the ball - just a quick
glance is all that is needed as they stroll along the
fairway (to ensure that their prediction is correct, and it
is a ball not a cowpat). Striking any ball that meets the
definition of a ball will do, it needn't be your own - in
fact such an action is a genuine indicator of the degree to
which your comprehension of the true potential of this
exciting game is developing."
"How much success are we having with our up-to-date,
golfer-centered philosophy? We have numerous anecdotes from
dedicated teachers who find our approach so much more
rewarding - they have no trouble engaging their students;
they see the joy on the faces of the students; they are
exhilarated to be part of this important redefinition of the
essence of the game."
"Scores? You ask? Unfortunately that question is very
revealing of your failure to keep up with modern research.
You are still dominated by out-dated reductionist models of
golf. One cannot validly and reliably keep scores without
interfering in the golfing process; scores do not reflect
all that is entailed by golf; they fail to capture more than
the most miniscule element of the whole game. Scores are
likely to be used to compare golfer to golfer - which is an
unconscionable intrusion on the innate developmental
trajectory of each individual seeker of golf prowess."
"We anticipate our philosophy will sweep the golfing
world. It is new, innovative, flexible - everyone's a
winner. And we won't stop there either. We already have
plans to take on swimming coaching for beginners, using our
proven immersion techniques. The sky's the limit - Hey,
Kenny G., have you thought about using our approach for
beginning skydiver training?"
Contact Us | Donate
|